Panic attack for Klaus’s Young Global Leaders
Klaus and his ‘Young Global Leaders’ seem to be getting rather over-excited recently, with their increasingly frenzied attacks and scapegoating of those heretics and blasphemers of their cherished plans for the New World Order. But then this is perhaps understandable, as everything is beginning to unravel. The new scariant Omicron is not only proving to be no worse (or even distinguishable) from a common cold, but may even end up conferring a lasting (natural) immunity to many of the variants in a way the fake vaccines where clearly failing to do. To make matters worse, people are starting a wake up from their Mass Formation Psychosis, (a long standing area of psychology research and recently publicised by Dr Robert Malone following new research by Prof Matthias Desmet), and are resisting the new lifetime subscription to endless gene therapies being pushed by versions of the ministry of truth such as the Trusted News Initiative.
Unfortunately, neither side can afford to back down in this war, so expect the entrenched acolytes of Klaus and those interests behind him to keep doubling down with further attempts to sow division to de-legitimise and marginalise opposition. That suggests a probably messy first part of 2022 as coersion is applied to force vaccination across most of the EU.
The Great reset – the plan is that by 2030 ‘You will own nothing, and you will be happy.’”
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” – Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.
- COVID-19 : “A golden opportunity” – HRH the Prince of Wales and other leaders on the Forum’s Great Reset
- Emmanuel Macron (French President and Alumni of the World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders Forum): “I’m not one for annoying the French,” he said. “But right now, the non-vaccinated, I really want to piss them off … and so we’re going to continue doing so until the end. This is the strategy.”
(“Les non-vaccinés, j’ai très envie de les emmerder”, a dit Emmanuel Macron dans nos colonne)
- Jacinda Ardern. (Prime Minister New Zealand & WEF young global leader alumni)
“It will become very clear to people that if you are not vaccinated there will be things that you miss out on, everyday things that you will miss out on,”
- Justin Trudeau (Prime Minister Canada & WEF young global leader alumni) on the unvaccinated: “They don’t believe in science/progress and are very often misogynistic and racist”.
“It’s a very small group of people, but that doesn’t shy away from the fact that they take up some space.”
“This leads us, as a leader and as a country, to make a choice. Do we tolerate these people?”
Notice a pattern?
Crimes against humanity?
The principle of bodily autonomy and requirement for informed consent prior to any administration of medical treatment or procedure is well established in English law (including also Article 3 in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights – “everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity”), albeit including certain (very) rare exceptions when it comes to communicable disease. The instances of the exercise of these powers by government though, has been extremely rare; and in large part due to the potential for abuse and of course the vigorous hostility and rejection by the public whenever attempted. In the current circumstances of a disease with such a high survivability rate outside the old and unhealthy (under 400 deaths in England & Wales for those under 65 and without co-morbidities), notwithstanding the criminal denial of early treatments, it would be difficult to sustain a convincing legal argument for the attempted exercise of such draconian enforcement however, at least in England.
If the permissible circumstances for the mandatory ‘vaccinations’ are a legal grey area (perhaps explaining the increasing desperation by governments to sustain the fear propaganda), the issue of forced medical experimentation is surely long settled by the lessons of WW2 and subsequent Nuremberg Code and Helsinki Accords.
‘Independent fact-checkers’ funded by globalist paymasters however, have laced the internet and search returns with various ‘expert’ opinions as to why the Nuremberg code ought not apply
One such group is Fullfact.org, albeit including funding from globalist interests such as Google, Facebook and Soros one might question if it is as ‘independent’ or impartial as it claims
Take for example one such authoritative posting by ‘fullfact’
“This claim that the Covid-19 vaccines are experimental is simply not true, and something we have corrected multiple times. The three Covid vaccines currently given temporary authorisation for use in the UK have been shown to be safe and effective in large scale clinical trials.”
There are two glaring problems with the above position however. Firstly, the authorisations are only on an ‘emergency use’ basis because they remain experimental and have not completed the required safety trials for full use authorisation. These ‘vaccines’ therefore are still in trial and are very much part of an ongoing vast experiment. Indeed, they are not even vaccines, but are experimental gene therapies that neither impart immunity nor stop transmission of the disease, as the data is currently demonstrating. What makes the so-called fact-checkers assertions all the more galling has been the ongoing disclosures of misconduct by Pfizer in its initial safety trails, the vast scale of the known adverse events, including over 1,220 deaths to end Feb 2021) and even worse, the collusion of the FDA and CDC to suppress and withhold this information from the public. These gene therapies are by far and away the most dangerous medicines ever to be authorised by the FDA (already with three times the deaths registered on VAERS as all previous recorded vaccines combined). With Israel now pushing a fourth dose as triple vaccinated fill up the hospitals and studies out of Denmark showing a negative efficacy of approx -76% on the Pfizer shot after only 90 days, these treatments are clearly neither safe nor effective.
Nuremberg therefore would seem to fully apply, notwithstanding the occasional German leader, such as Der Leyen and French and Italian collaborators to suggesting otherwise.
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision
Somehow, I don’t think those hysterical screechings from Macron, Adhern and Trudeau will age particularly well